Crypto Hacks

Recent crypto hacks and thefts

The latest crypto hacks, exploits and exchange thefts, newest first: who was hit, how much was taken, how it happened and what came back. Every known incident since 2011, searchable by name, chain or attack type.

Last updated · Checked daily

$9.04B
stolen in 2026
440 incidents
$6.61B
stolen in the last 30 days
59 incidents
$6.36B
biggest on record
Binance, Oct 29, 2026
$30.1B
stolen since 2011
2,404 incidents

2,404 incidents

  1. New Market TradingOtherEthereumBaseArbitrum$3.98M

    A flaw in New Market Trading’s SquidRouterModule let attackers use addresses they supplied to pass permission checks, then route assets through attacker-controlled pools. They drained funds from 88 Gnosis Safe wallets across Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum.

    How Improper Access Control (Access Control)Chains Ethereum, Base, ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, RektRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  2. Third-party Gnosis Safe Module (SquidRouterModule)$3.2M

    A faulty third-party Gnosis Safe module, which victims had trusted to spend their tokens without further signatures, accepted a publicly visible string as proof and let the attacker run arbitrary transactions. Fake swaps drained about $3 million from 86 wallets; the funds were consolidated into DAI.

    How Smart Contract VulnerabilityReported by SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  3. WUSD.fi / GLOVELiquidity PoolEthereum$200K

    Attackers used flash loans and many wallets to repeatedly claim GLOVE rewards because the reward system lacked protection against duplicate accounts. They sold the rewards into Uniswap V3 pools, draining about $200,000 in USDC and USDT.

    How Reward Logic Flaw (Protocol Logic)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  4. BitmorDeFi ProtocolBase$6K

    An access-control flaw in Bitmor’s DCA contract on Base let attackers drain tokens from wallets whose owners had active approvals for the contract.

    How Token Approval Abuse (Access Control)Chains BaseReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  5. Fractal ProtocolDeFi ProtocolArbitrum$13.7K

    The attacker used flash-loan callbacks to repeatedly re-enter Fractal’s USDF vault, exploiting its share calculations to withdraw more USDC.e than they deposited. About 13,700 USDC.e was taken, leaving the vault’s liquid USDC buffer nearly empty.

    How Reentrancy (Reentrancy)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  6. StablRDeFi ProtocolEthereum$2.8M

    After one of StablR’s three multisig keys was compromised, the attacker minted 8.35 million USDR and 4.5 million EURR without collateral and sold them for about $2.8 million in ETH. Both stablecoins depegged.

    How Private Key Compromised (Key Compromise)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  7. MureDeFi ProtocolEthereum$11.7K

    A flaw in signature checking let an attacker use a malicious contract to bypass verification and drain 4.85 million QUEST tokens that had been approved for Mure’s distribution contract. The tokens were swapped for about 5.45 ETH.

    How Signature Verification Flaw (Input Validation)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  8. PolymarketDeFi ProtocolPolygon$700K

    An attacker used a compromised six-year-old operations wallet key to withdraw USDC and POL on Polygon in batches. Polymarket froze some funds and said user funds and platform operations were unaffected.

    How Private Key Compromised (Key Compromise)Chains PolygonReported loss $573K to $700KReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  9. RetoSwapDeFi ProtocolMonero$2.7M

    RetoSwap failed to verify the source of trade acknowledgment messages, allowing attackers to impersonate arbitrators and redirect multisig wallets to attacker-controlled addresses. About 7,000 XMR was stolen from traders.

    How Missing Input Validation (Input Validation)Chains MoneroReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  10. Butter Bridge$180K

    A flaw in the Butter Bridge’s retry-message checks let an attacker forge a cross-chain message and mint unbacked MAPO tokens. They sold about 1 billion of them for roughly $180,000 in liquidity; most of the fake tokens remained in the attacker’s wallet.

    How Smart Contract VulnerabilityReported by SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  11. MAP ProtocolChainBridgeEthereumBSC$110K

    A flaw in Butter Bridge’s retry-message checks let an attacker mint unauthorized MAPO tokens on Ethereum and BNB Chain. They extracted about 52.2 ETH in value before MAPO’s price crashed.

    How Infinite Mint (Token & Share Accounting)Chains Ethereum, BSCReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  12. BankrAI AgentBase$170K

    Attackers used stolen or tricked session tokens or signing keys to make direct transfers from 14 Bankr users’ Base wallets, bypassing token approvals. About $170,000 was taken; Bankr paused the affected functionality and pledged reimbursement.

    How Session Key Compromised (Frontend & Infrastructure)Chains BaseReported loss $170K to $440KReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  13. HermesVaultDeFi ProtocolAlgorand$26K returned$30K

    A flaw in HermesVault’s withdrawal script let an attacker bypass checks of zero-knowledge proofs, which validate transactions without revealing their details, and withdraw ALGO without authorization. The team patched the issue and began refunding affected users.

    How Withdrawal Logic Flaw (Protocol Logic)Chains AlgorandReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  14. ElevateFiDeFi ProtocolPolygon$16K

    The attacker used flash-loan-funded buying to inflate EFI’s price in a Uniswap pool, which ElevateFi’s staking vault read directly without a price safeguard. This let the attacker create staking positions recording $2.5 million in principal using only 713.5 EFI each time, repeated 100 times.

    How Spot Price Manipulation (Oracle Manipulation)Chains PolygonReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  15. Echo ProtocolDeFi ProtocolBridgeMonad$821K

    An attacker who obtained Echo Protocol’s admin key minted 1,000 unbacked eBTC on Monad, then used some as collateral to borrow WBTC and swap it for ETH. About 384 ETH was sent to Tornado Cash, while most of the minted eBTC remained under the attacker’s control.

    How Private Key Compromised (Key Compromise)Chains MonadReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  16. Verus-Ethereum BridgeDeFi ProtocolBridgeVerus$11.5M

    An attacker forged a cross-chain message to exploit the Verus-Ethereum bridge, turning small VRSC fees into millions of dollars in Ethereum-based assets. The attacker later returned about 4,052 ETH, while reports said roughly 1,350 ETH remained in their wallet.

    How Forged Proof (Bridge & Cross-Chain)Chains VerusReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  17. SEA TokenTokenArbitrum$153K

    SEA Token interactions on Arbitrum were exploited through price manipulation, reportedly using a flash loan to distort the token’s price. The attacker extracted about $153,000 in value; the precise mechanism was not confirmed.

    How Spot Price Manipulation (Oracle Manipulation)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  18. MetaSeaDeFi ProtocolArbitrum$110K

    MetaSea’s redemption function overpaid SEA yield when positions were opened and redeemed in the same block. Using flash loans, the attacker repeatedly deposited USDT, claimed and sold excess SEA, and extracted about $110,000 across eight attacks.

    How Withdrawal Logic Flaw (Protocol Logic)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  19. Adshares BridgeOtherBridgeEthereum$628K

    Attackers used the bridge’s signer to approve three wrapping requests tied to nonexistent Adshares-chain transactions, creating fake wrapped ADS tokens. Selling them drained about $628,000 in ETH and USDC from Ethereum liquidity pools.

    How Forged Proof (Bridge & Cross-Chain)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  20. THORChainChainBridgeBitcoinEthereumBase+1 chains$10.7M

    A flaw in THORChain’s threshold-signature system, which lets multiple participants authorize transactions together, allowed a malicious node to obtain enough vault key material to authorize withdrawals. The attacker drained protocol-owned funds across multiple chains; user funds and liquidity-provider positions were reported safe.

    How Bridge Logic Flaw (Bridge & Cross-Chain)Chains Bitcoin, Ethereum, Base, BSCReported by DefiLlama, SlowMist, RektRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  21. Transit FinanceDeFi ProtocolTron$1.88M

    An attacker exploited vulnerabilities in Transit Finance’s discontinued TRON contract, draining about $1.88 million in DAI and other assets. The funds were moved to an Ethereum address; the team said current contracts were unaffected and promised to compensate users.

    How Improper Access Control (Access Control)Chains TronReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  22. ShapeShift FOX ColonyDeFi ProtocolArbitrum$133K

    An attacker exploited a flaw in FOX Colony’s meta-transaction authorization to replace its routing component with a malicious version, then use it to drain ERC-20 tokens. The reported losses ranged from about $132,700 to $182,700; the core exchange platform was unaffected.

    How Arbitrary External Call (Access Control)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  23. Aurellion LabsRWAArbitrum$456K

    An incompletely initialized proxy contract let an attacker call its setup function and take ownership, then add a malicious function to drain USDC from wallets that had approved the contract. The project paused operations and committed to reimbursing users.

    How Uninitialized Proxy (Access Control)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  24. SQ ProtocolDeFi ProtocolBSC$346K

    A hardcoded owner backdoor in SQ Protocol’s staking contract let the attacker take control, create fake staking claims and redeem about 296,500 USDT, then sell SQi tokens for more. Total realized losses were about $346,000.

    How Improper Access Control (Access Control)Chains BSCReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  25. BoostHookDeFi ProtocolEthereum$187K

    An attacker used a flash loan to push up the ETH/PERP pool price, opened leveraged positions at the inflated price, then reversed the move. A limit on liquidations left four positions with 8 ETH of debt each open, creating bad debt for BoostHook.

    How Spot Price Manipulation (Oracle Manipulation)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  26. IEXCBPDeFi ProtocolBNB Chain$97K

    An attacker manipulated PancakeSwap’s live token prices while using flash loans and multiple accounts to exploit IEXCBP’s reward-withdrawal calculations. The protocol’s entire reward pool was drained.

    How Spot Price Manipulation (Oracle Manipulation)Chains BNB ChainReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  27. TACDeFi ProtocolBridgeTONTAC$2.85M

    An attacker used a counterfeit USD₮ wallet on the TON side of the TON–TAC bridge to send a fraudulent message and mint unbacked TAC tokens. The incident drained locked assets, including USDT, BLUM, and tsTON, and the bridge was paused.

    How Proof Verifier Bug (Bridge & Cross-Chain)Chains TON, TACReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  28. Ink FinanceDeFi ProtocolPolygon$140K

    A flaw in Ink Finance’s treasury proxy whitelist let an attacker use a malicious contract posing as an approved claimer to make unauthorized transfers. About $140,000 in USDT was stolen, with a flash loan helping fund the attack.

    How Caller Impersonation (Access Control)Chains PolygonReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  29. Huma FinanceDeFi ProtocolPolygon$101K

    A logic and access-control flaw in Huma Finance’s deprecated V1 credit pools let an attacker advance unapproved credit records and borrow the pools’ remaining funds. About 101,400 USDC and USDC.e was taken from protocol and pool-owner fees; user funds were not at risk.

    How Improper Access Control (Access Control)Chains PolygonReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  30. Roaring Kitty‘s X accountUndisclosed

    Attackers apparently took over Keith Gill’s verified X account and used it to promote a Solana meme coin, briefly driving its market value higher before the posts were deleted and the price crashed. More than 80 wallets reportedly lost about $2.86 million.

    How The X account was hackedReported by SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  31. RenegadeDeFi ProtocolArbitrum$209K returned$209K

    An unprotected initializer and an out-of-sync proxy version counter let an attacker install malicious logic in Renegade V1 and drain 27 tokens. A whitehat returned about $190,000 of the roughly $209,000 taken; the V1 Arbitrum deployment was paused.

    How Uninitialized Proxy (Access Control)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  32. TrustedVolumesOtherEthereum$6.7M

    Missing access controls in TrustedVolumes’ RFQ swap proxy let the attacker add themselves as an authorized order signer and forge trades, draining WETH, WBTC, USDT and USDC. About $2 million in ETH was later returned, with a similar amount reportedly retained by the attacker.

    How Caller Impersonation (Access Control)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMist, RektRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  33. Ekubo ProtocolDeFi ProtocolEthereum$1.4M

    A flaw in Ekubo’s swap extension let attackers use users’ existing token approvals to transfer tokens to themselves without authorization. They stole 17 wBTC, worth about $1.4 million, and laundered the funds through Tornado Cash.

    How Token Approval Abuse (Access Control)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  34. SquidRouterModuleDeFi ProtocolEthereumBase$3.2M

    A verification flaw in SquidRouterModule treated a publicly known string as proof of a secure message, letting an attacker impersonate Gnosis Safe wallet owners and execute transactions. The attacker drained 86 vaults, consolidating about $3.2 million in DAI.

    How Improper Access Control (Access Control)Chains Ethereum, BaseReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  35. SmartCreditDeFi ProtocolEthereum$72K

    SmartCredit’s Leveraged Lido staking feature was exploited, draining funds from the module. The team paused the feature and said its Loss Provision Fund would cover affected stakers’ losses.

    How Unknown (Protocol Logic)Chains EthereumReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  36. Bisq v1DeFi ProtocolBitcoin$550K

    A flaw in Bisq v1’s trade protocol let modified clients bypass checks on negative miner fees and take Bitcoin from multisig trade outputs. About 11 BTC was stolen from 10 users; Bisq v2 and Easy were unaffected.

    How Missing Input Validation (Input Validation)Chains BitcoinReported loss $550K to $876KReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  37. Sharwa.FinanceDeFi ProtocolArbitrum$32.9K

    An attacker manipulated oracle price data on Arbitrum to extract value from Sharwa.Finance. The protocol lost about $32,850.

    How Spot Price Manipulation (Oracle Manipulation)Chains ArbitrumReported by DefiLlamaRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  38. Wasabi ProtocolDeFi ProtocolEthereumBaseBerachain+1 chains$5.5M

    Attackers obtained Wasabi’s deployer key and used it to upgrade vaults and pools across Ethereum, Base, Berachain, and Blast, then withdraw funds. Reports put losses at roughly $5.5 million, including user funds and treasury assets.

    How Deployer Key Compromised (Key Compromise)Chains Ethereum, Base, Berachain, BlastReported by DefiLlama, SlowMist, RektRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  39. Sweat FoundationDeFi ProtocolNear$3.5M

    A logic flaw in the SWEAT token contract let an attacker use a custom drain contract to take tokens from foundation-controlled accounts and sell some of them. The team patched the contract and restored external users’ balances.

    How Withdrawal Logic Flaw (Protocol Logic)Chains NearReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

  40. Aftermath FinanceDeFi ProtocolSui$1.14M

    A fee-accounting flaw let an attacker set negative builder fees to inflate synthetic collateral and withdraw funds from Aftermath’s perpetuals vault. They drained about $1.14 million in USDC; other products were unaffected.

    How Withdrawal Logic Flaw (Protocol Logic)Chains SuiReported by DefiLlama, SlowMistRecord updated Nov 12, 2026

Biggest crypto hacks by year

Sources, consolidated into one record per incident:

  • DefiLlama checked
  • SlowMist checked
  • Rekt checked

Amounts are US dollar values at the time of each incident; where sources report different figures, the record shows the range. Summaries by CryptoCoin.News. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.